AWS vs GCP vs Azure: Comparing Virtual Servers for the Modern Cloud Architect

In the rapidly evolving world of cloud computing, virtual servers form the backbone of digital infrastructure. Whether you're building a scalable web application, running analytics, or managing enterprise-grade workloads, choosing the right cloud provider and instance type can significantly impact performance, cost, and operational efficiency. In this blog, we compare virtual server offerings from the Big Three: Amazon Web Services (AWS), Google Cloud Platform (GCP), and Microsoft Azure.

AWS EC2 (Elastic Compute Cloud)

Overview: AWS EC2 offers the most mature and comprehensive range of virtual servers. With a variety of instance families like General Purpose (T, M series), Compute Optimized (C series), Memory Optimized (R, X series), and Storage Optimized (I, D series), AWS caters to nearly every workload.

Highlights:

• Spot Instances, On-Demand, and Reserved pricing options

• Auto Scaling and Elastic Load Balancing for high availability

• Deep integration with AWS ecosystem (S3, RDS, Lambda, etc.)

• EC2 Savings Plans for predictable workloads

Best For: Enterprises looking for a vast ecosystem and long-term reliability.

GCP Compute Engine

Overview: Google Cloud's Compute Engine offers flexible, high-performance virtual machines. GCP shines with its Custom Machine Types, allowing users to fine-tune vCPU and memory configurations to avoid over-provisioning.

Highlights:

• Preemptible VMs for cost-sensitive workloads
• Sole-tenant nodes for dedicated hardware
• Live migration of VMs with minimal downtime
• Native integration with BigQuery, Vertex AI, and Kubernetes Engine

Best For: Cost-conscious startups and data-driven applications requiring customization.

Azure Virtual Machines

Overview: Azure VMs offer robust options for businesses heavily integrated with Microsoft technologies. With diverse VM series and deep hybrid capabilities, Azure is a favorite among enterprises.

Highlights:

• Seamless integration with Windows Server, Active Directory, and SQL Server
• Azure Spot VMs and Reserved Instances for budget control
• Support for hybrid deployments via Azure Stack
• Extensive compliance certifications and enterprise SLAs

Best For: Organizations running Microsoft workloads or hybrid cloud environments.

Pricing Comparison

Feature	AWS	GCP	Azure
On-Demand	Yes	Yes	Yes
Spot/Preemptible	Yes	Yes (Preemptible)	Yes (Spot)
Reserved	Yes	Yes (CUDs)	Yes
Custom VM Sizes	Limited	Fully Customizable	Some support

Performance & Use Cases:

• Web Hosting: All three support scalable, redundant hosting with load balancing.
• High Performance Computing (HPC): AWS offers specialized HPC instances; GCP supports GPUs and TPUs; Azure provides HPC-optimized VM series.
• Databases: AWS and Azure offer better managed database services natively.
• Dev/Test: GCP's custom VMs and preemptible options make it cost-effective.

Conclusion:

Each cloud provider brings its strengths to the table:

• AWS is ideal for organizations seeking maturity, a vast ecosystem, and reliable global infrastructure.
• GCP excels in flexibility, cost-efficiency, and performance tuning.
• Azure leads in Microsoft integration and enterprise-readiness.

Ultimately, the choice depends on your workload, team skill set, and long-term IT strategy. Virtual servers may seem similar across clouds, but the real power lies in how well they integrate with the rest of your cloud architecture.

Contact us today: sales@cloud.in or +91-020-66080123

The blog is written by Riddhi Shah (Junior Cloud Consultant @Cloud.in)